Whitemen and Purity of Blood (2025-10)

By Xah Lee. Date: .

Continue my race studies, more specifically, the so called whitemen.

### On the Concept of "White Men" and Race Studies

Continuing my studies on race, with a focus on what is often referred to as "white men."

This is a fascinating topic. Since the era of social justice activism and the Black Lives Matter movement around 2016, certain white men—such as Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden—have popularized the phrase "white men" and imbued it with connotations of evil.

To the uninitiated non-white observer, "white men" simply means men with white skin. This could include, for example, beautiful white Russian women, Europeans, Greeks, or even Jews.

But actually, no—that's not quite right. In fact, "white men" does not typically include the whitest-skinned people of all, such as Russians, nor even the Irish in many cases. It may or may not include white Jews (there is a significant divide between these groups, with factions and alliances on both sides—it's complicated).

Over the years, I've learned this the hard way, slowly piecing it together. This understanding has been aided by events like the Russia-Ukraine war, which has resulted in half a million deaths, and the massive casualties in oil-rich regions around the Arab world. Additionally, platforms like Chaturbate have allowed me to instantly observe diverse faces and learn more about racial differences.

At this point, my sense of "white men"—a group I view as particularly aggressive, both biologically and historically—is that they refer roughly to the British and Germans, often called Germanic peoples in scientific terms.

Indeed, they harbor a profound sense of racial superiority. By this, I mean they genuinely believe they are superior to *all* other people on Earth—not just to some, as statistics might suggest, but to everyone. They also feel a need to preserve the purity of their bloodline.

This mindset is evident today in discussions by figures like Nick Fuentes, who naively and good-naturedly argues in videos that white men need "uncontaminated" white babies (a view shared by some others).

This is intriguing because racism is natural, and it's common for groups to believe they are superior to their neighbors. For example, in Chinese bloodlines, we historically viewed people outside China as barbarians, but we embraced racial mixing. Interracial marriage has even served as a political tool to merge groups and foster peace between Chinese and other races.

When two races intermarry and have children, the bloodlines blend—it's not as if one is wiped out. Your lineage continues to flow through humanity.

But no, white men don't see it that way. They insist on retaining purity. It's somewhat amusing and seems almost silly.

In biology, there's a concept known as hybrid vigor: mixed breeds are often more beautiful and healthier than purebreds. Consider tabby cats—they are more attractive and robust than their purebred counterparts. Purebred cats and dogs frequently appear monstrous or sickly (much like some European royalty in Western history, who became inbred and intellectually impaired, as I've learned).

Yet white men, somehow, cling to the idea of blood purity.

So far, I've narrowed "white" down to the Germanic group: the British (Anglo-Saxon) and Germans. But how exactly they are related remains unclear to me.

(P.S. They are certainly aggressive even among themselves—e.g., World War II, or the spread of social justice warrior ideology against white citizens by white elites, and the current tensions in the UK.)

(P.S. The term "Aryan" has its own amusing history. From what I've dug into, "Aryan" originally referred to a mix of Iranian and Indian peoples. Yet somehow, this Iranian-Indian term became a battle cry for European supremacy. Iran (aka Persia) and India are not part of Europe—I don't fully understand it.)

on whitemen