4D-Chess Pol View

By Xah Lee. Date: 2024-09-24.

2024-09-24

this is mentality of 4d-chessers

kinda idiotic.
the mentality is that, 4d chess, more specifically, everything must be some illuminati plot, or controlled opposition.
the logical problem with this view is that, it implies there isn't anyone powerful doing anything good. or that, such is impossible.
and, the problem of such view is that, when there's actually someone powerful doing good, they got smeared together with the bad lots.
because if anyone is doing good, we say they are just pretending to be, or allowed to be.
this controlled position view, is really idiotic in many ways.
at a deeper level, these type of people, their world is that, u have to ask, what is the result of their behavior.
basically, their behavior prevents justice to prevail.
they want a world that is eternally in chaos, in cloak and dagger, then, they r happy. is that it.
or, they take a non-participation observer seat, and just comment and analysis with the american idiom of popcorn.

the very concept of controlled opposition, is a questionable abstract philosophical take.
the concept is that, for mind control by the evil lords, they sometimes need to create distraction.
this controlled-opposition, is a concept more broadly belong to strategy of mind-control.
that is the context.
so again, like, playing 4d-chess.
it is a view, that view politics as a game, full of wiles and guiles.
when such people view the world, to them, it's all about games and strategies.
they stop seeing the world as good deeds and bad deeds.
everything is a strategy by someone.
these types, are idiots. they are, to their own style, a behavior that's created by the deepstate.
so that they forever discuss politics as a game. not actual relevance on what to do about it.

now, who r these types, viewing pol as 4d chess?
actually, not many. it's a handful.
but popular on a sector of internet.
typically, the academic types, or the memers, younglings, or conspiracy enjoyers.

let me give my view, what's a better take.
for example, take mike benz, or elon musk.
let's take elon musk as example, since more people know him.
elon musk, did at least a few important things against deepstate.
eg the twitter files, and allowing massive freespech on x, not necessarily on all aspects of pol, but on many aspects against deepstate with major impact.
for example, twitter files exposing the fbi, cia, gov collusion, election inteferance by us gov.
and exposing the millions of alien voter army biden imported.
and heavy dissing the sjw men get pregnant and sjw trans and cutting off of dicks and tits of teen.
to a degree that, the deepstate, want elon musk dead.
now, these are some very serious stuff, elon musk has done, against deepstate.

however, some anti usa guys, or the 4d chess types, will say, elon musk is bad, is just a controlled opposition.
eg the anti usa guys say, elon musk is part of the deepstate.
he is part of the usa military, essential part.
and the 4d chess types will say, elon musk is just a controlled opposition. because for example, he visited isral, chat with the geno criminal netyahoo. etc.
but the problem with these views is that, it ignored, what elon musk did against deepstate. big time.
because for example, if not for elon musk, their say, won't be seen on xcom.
but these types, ignore this fact.
they post on twitter, as if, somehow, elon musk is forced to let them litlle beings have a mouth. lol.
so what is a proper view?
u need to just look at things as they are, sans adding in some abstract or academic view.
did elon musk did good, in many thing againist the evil deepstate.
but what about, he is big part of usa deepstate weapon makers, and meet and welcome the geno criminal netyahoo?
that is true, but that does not obliterate what the good part elon did.
u see, human animals, r not flat.
nobody is perfect good.
and also, especially on the israle issue, u may not go all out on powerful evil forces in a blunt way. else u die.